Review The Collateral Information Of Case Scenario 3

PSY 622 Milestone Three: Case Scenario 3 Guidelines and Rubric (Substance Abuse Potential)
Prompt: Review the collateral information of Case Scenario 3. In the Assessment Data section, review the raw data of the SASSI-3. Appropriately interpret the scores. Based on your review of Therapeutic Risk Typologies, provide a one to two page recommendations report for child protective services and probation. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
III. Substance Abuse Potential (Case Scenario 3) a) Assess the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard (psychometrics). In other words, what is the known or potential

Save your time – order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

error rate? Has the data been derived using reliable methods? Is the data valid and reliable with regard to the scientific method? b) Evaluate the interview information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research. c) Evaluate the collateral information contained in the scenario for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process.
Substantiate your claims with specific research. d) Create a recommendations report for risk management based on the above elements. Justify your position with specific scholarly research. e) Be sure your recommendations report aligns with the ethical guidelines of a professional psychology association. Note: You do not need to
belong to an organization, but rather may view the ethical guidelines on the website of the organization of your choice. Guidelines for Submission: The recommendations report should follow these formatting guidelines: 1–2 pages, double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three citations in APA format. Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions.
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Substance Abuse Potential: Daubert
Comprehensively assesses the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard
Assesses the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard but with gaps in accuracy or detail
Does not assess the extent to which the case study data set meets the Daubert standard
18
Substance Abuse Potential: Interview
Information
Evaluates interview information appropriately for its implications in the risk assessment process and substantiates claims with specific research
Evaluates information but evaluation is not appropriate to the situation, or does not substantiate claims with research
Does not evaluate interview information
18
 
http://snhu-media.snhu.edu/files/course_repository/graduate/psy/psy622/case_scenario_three.pdf
http://snhu-media.snhu.edu/files/course_repository/graduate/psy/psy622/therapeutic_risk_typologies.pdf
http://snhu-media.snhu.edu/files/production_documentation/formatting/rubric_feedback_instructions_student.pdf

 
 
Substance Abuse Potential: Collateral
Information
Evaluates collateral information appropriately for its implications in the risk assessment and recommendations process and substantiates claims with specific research
Evaluates collateral information but evaluation is not appropriate to the situation, or does not substantiate claims with research
Does not evaluate collateral information
18
Substance Abuse Potential:
Recommendations
Proposes appropriate recommendations and justifies with research
Proposes recommendations that are not appropriate to the situation, or does not justify with research
Does not propose recommendations
18
Substance Abuse Potential: Ethical
Guidelines
Employs appropriate ethical guidelines of a professional organization in making recommendations
Employs ethical guidelines but guidelines are not appropriate to the situation or are not supported by a professional organization
Does not employ ethical guidelines
18
Articulation of Response
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas
10
Earned Total 100%

 
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

Rate this post
"Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you with a guaranteed plagiarism-free A+ quality paper. Discount Code: SUPER50!"
Assignment Writers