Powerpoint Thematic analysis of the effectiveness of an inpatient
In a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation, address the following:Provide an overview of the article you selected, including answers to the following questions:What type of group was discussed?Who were the participants in the group? Why were they selected?What was the setting of the group?How often did the group meet?What was the duration of the group therapy?What curative factors might be important for this group and why?What “exclusion criteria” did the authors mention?Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your own client groups. If so, how? If not, why?Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article.
Here is the article
Yildiran, H., & Holt, R. R. (2015). Thematic analysis of the effectiveness of an inpatient mindfulness group for adults with intellectual disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(1), 49–54. doi:10.1111/bld.12085Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.
attachement
O R I G I N A L A R T I C L E
Thematic analysis of the effectiveness of an inpatient mindfulness group for adults with intellectual disabilities
Hatice Yildiran and Rachel R. Holt, Community Support Unit, Hertfordshire Partnership University,
NHS Foundation Trust, 14 Stratford Road, Watford, Hertfordshire, WD17 4DG, UK (E-mail:
hatice.yildiran@hpft.nhs.uk)
Accessible summary • Mindfulness helps people focus instead of worrying about the past or future. • We talked to six people who took part in a mindfulness group. • They all had intellectual disabilities and were in hospital for mental health
problems.
• They told us the group helped, and we hope that mindfulness can help other people too.
Summary The study focused on the effectiveness of group mindfulness for people with
intellectual disabilities in an assessment and treatment unit. Six participants with
mild or moderate intellectual disabilities were interviewed using semi-structured
interviews. The interviews focused on identifying the benefits and difficulties of
using mindfulness. The interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. Five
themes were identified which were categorised into interpersonal (‘helping people’)
and intrapersonal (‘focusing on one particular thing’; ‘improving skills’; get rid of all
nasty bad stuff you want to get rid of’) benefits. The theme ‘bit too late to teach old
dog new tricks’ captured the difficulties encountered. The themes highlighted that
people with intellectual disabilities were able to form an understanding of
mindfulness and were able to benefit from the intervention.
Keywords Group, inpatient, intellectual disabilities, mindfulness, thematic analysis
Introduction
Over the years, Buddhist meditative practices have been
making their way into the clinical arena and being incor-
porated into traditional Western psychotherapies (Felder
et al. 2012). One such meditative practice is that of mind-
fulness, the art of being present in the moment and
accepting it without judgement (‘paying attention in a
particular way: on purpose, in the present moment, and non
judgmentally’ (Kabat-Zinn 1994, p.4). This requires two
components: firstly, the ability to pay attention to the
moment and secondly, to be curious, open and accepting of
your experience in the moment (Bishop et al. 2004).
There is an emerging evidence base for the effectiveness of
mindfulness in the treatment of various mental health
problems such as depression (Siegal et al. 2002) and anxiety
(Hofmann et al. 2010). It is also aNational Institute for Health
and Clinical Excellence (NICE)-recommended treatment (as
part of dialectical behaviour therapy) for people with
borderline personality disorder (NICE 2009). Mindfulness
ª 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 49–54 doi:10.1111/bld.12085
British Journal of
Learning Disabilities The Official Journal of the British Institute of Learning Disabilities
interventions have also been found to be effective with
diverse client populations including children (Burke 2010),
adolescents (Biegel 2009) and people with intellectual dis-
abilities (Singh et al. 2007).
The growing evidence base for people with intellectual
disabilities is of particular interest to this paper. There is
increasing evidence for the ‘Soles of the Feet’ programme
(Singh et al. 2003) which encourages people to shift their
attention from their angry thoughts to a neutral point on
their body – soles of their feet. The benefits of involvement
in the programme have included people with moderate
intellectual disabilities being able to manage their anger in
constructive ways and thus avoiding their community
placements from breaking down (Singh et al. 2007).
An interesting additional benefit of mindfulness can be
seen when looking into the effects it has on staff caring for
people with intellectual disabilities. This is particularly
relevant in the light of the recent Winterbourne View abuse
scandal of 2011, which identified frequent use of inappropri-
ate restraint (Care Quality Commission 2011). Although
factors contributing to the abuse at Winterbourne View are
complex and systemic, frequent use of restraint has been
linked to staff stress caused by work related issues (Paterson
et al. 2011). There is evidence that mindfulness is effective in
reducing psychological distress for staff workingwith people
with intellectual disabilities. In particular, the promotion of
acceptance in carers and teachers has been found to be
effective with staff reporting less stress, particularly those
who did not have a professional qualification and may have
been more vulnerable (Noone & Hastings 2010). Further
benefits of mindfulness for staff and services include reduc-
tion in physical restraint by staff (Singh et al. 2009) and cost
effectiveness by reducing sick days and medical rehabilita-
tion for staff who have been injured (Singh et al. 2008).
The effectiveness of mindfulness in intellectual disabili-
ties has been attributed to the experiential nature of the
activities which do not require sophisticated verbal reason-
ing skills as some traditional psychotherapies warrant such
as cognitive behaviour therapy (Brown & Hooper 2009).
Current interest in the field appears to be in relation to
further adaptations of mindfulness to suit the needs of
people with intellectual disabilities. However, research is at
the early stages, and further investigations are needed in the
area of adaptations (Robertson 2011).
The current study aimed to explore people with intellec-
tual disabilities’ understanding of mindfulness, including
the benefits and difficulties they experienced in their use of
mindfulness exercises.
Methods
The current study explored a range of mindfulness exer-
cises, taught and practiced during a weekly relaxation and
mindfulness group. The group was held on an inpatient
assessment and treatment unit for people with intellectual
disabilities and acute mental health problems. The inpatient
therapy room was transformed into a space which was
separate from other clinical activities which took place there
(e.g. one-to-one sessions) with input from participants.
Sensory lamps and light background music were used to
transform the space.
One exercise was an adaptation of the raisin exercise
(Kabat-Zinn 2012). The raisin script was generalised to fruits.
Participants were prompted to focus on different sensory
features of the fruit. They were prompted to focus on what it
feels like in their hand, what colours they can see, what
shape it was, focus on the scent, taste and sounds whilst
eating the fruit. The fruit was used as a tangible focal point
for participants to orient themselves to the present moment.
The group members focused on a different fruit each week.
The relaxation and mindfulness group also involved
other mindfulness-related exercises. Muscle tension and
relaxation was used with a mindfulness element including a
body scan; participants were prompted to notice the
changes in their bodies and locate where the warm feelings
were. Deep breathing whilst meditating on the breath was
also used in the group; participants were prompted to focus
on the tip of thei r nose, noticing the sound of the breath and
the air on the face. Further olfactory experiences were
explored in the group; incense sticks and candles were used
to focus on scents; participants were prompted to focus their
attention on the scents of fruits and flowers.
During times where it was evident that participants’
thoughts drifted away from the present moment, they were
reminded to bring their focus back to the tangible anchor
point used in the exercises which included fruits, incense
and candle sticks, warm feelings in their body and the tip of
their nose.
The group was facilitated by trainee and assistant clinical
psychologists. It had been running for 1.5 years at the time
the interviews took place for this study.
Participants
Seven inpatients who had taken part in the group were
invited to take part in the study. Group participants who
had been discharged from the inpatient unit were not
contacted due to the potential difficulties (such as possible
confusion and misinterpretation of being contacted by the
inpatient team). One participant was discharged during the
study phase and was interviewed in their community
placement.
Six service users chose to participate in the study. Smaller
sample sizes are accepted in the literature for qualitative
research as evidenced in the following quote:
Qualitative research methods differ from quantitative
approaches in many important aspects … Quantitative
ª 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 49–54
50 H. Yildiran and R. R. Holt
researchers capture a shallow band of information from
a wide swath of people and seek … to understand,
predict, or influence what people do. Qualitative
researchers generally study many fewer people, but
delve more deeply into those individuals, settings,
subcultures … hoping to generate a subjective under-
standing of how and why people perceive … interpret,
and interact … both approaches are theoretically
valuable(Barker & Edwards 2012).
Participants had diagnoses of mild or moderate intellec-
tual disabilities. All the participants had additional diagno-
ses including paranoid personality disorder, autism,
recurrent depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and epi-
lepsy. They were all inpatients at a specialist assessment
and treatment unit for people with intellectual disabilities
and acute mental health problems. The sample consisted of
four females and two males. The age range was 21–64 years
(mean age 44 years). The number of sessions of mindfulness
that the participants had attended was between 2 and 23
(mean number of sessions attended was 10).
Procedure
All participants were deemed to have capacity to consent by
their Clinical team. Informed consent was given by all the
participants. Semi-structured interviews were used for data
collection during June 2012. The interview schedule was
developed by the first author generating topics relevant to
the experience of mindfulness in a group setting – which
included topics about understanding of the intervention,
benefits and difficulties. The interview schedule was dis-
cussed and agreed by both authors. The interview included
open questions (e.g. ‘What do you do in the group’) and
closed questions related to the practicalities of the group
(e.g. ‘The relaxation and mindfulness group is at 4 pm on
Wednesdays. Are you happy with this time and date? Yes/
No’).
The first author carried out all the interviews one-to-one
with participants, in a quiet area of the inpatient unit. All
participants knew the main interviewer, who was one of the
facilitators of the group. The participants’ responses were
written verbatim by the first author during the interviews,
due to anticipated distress that audio recordings may cause,
particularly participants with paranoid personality disor-
ders. Written transcripts were anonymised and stored in a
locked filing cabinet.
Materials from the relaxation and mindfulness group
were used to aid participants’ understanding of the ques-
tions and to aid their memory (the first author gave a visual
demonstration of holding the fruit by cupping her hand and
showed participants the CDs, incense sticks and candles).
These aids were used as it was thought that the participants
may have difficulties with orientating themselves to the
topic of discussion and to associating the questions to their
experiences in the group.
Results
The data were analysed using thematic analysis. This is a
method for identifying and analysing patterns in qualitative
data (Braun & Clarke 2013). Thematic analysis was used
because it is relatively quick to do and accessible to novice
researchers (Braun & Clarke 2006) and thus suitable for the
two authors who are both primarily clinicians rather than
researchers. Further advantages are its flexibility and
potential to generate unanticipated insights.
The current study used the six phases of thematic analysis
proposed by Braun & Clarke (2013). The first phase of
‘familiarisation’ of the data was achieved by the first author
conducting the interviews and both authors reading and
rereading the interview transcripts. The second phase,
‘coding’ involved collating and coding quotes taken from
the interviews. ‘Searching for themes’ was achieved by
looking for similarity between the codes and grouping
similar codes together. This was initially done by the two
authors individually. ‘Reviewing themes’ was achieved by
both authors sharing their analyses of the data and
comparing and discussing themes. Themes that emerged
in both authors analyses and worked in relation to the
coded extracts and the entire data set were retained. Themes
that had only emerged in one analysis were discussed and
checked to see whether they met the threshold of working in
relation to the data. Themes that were similar and did not
provide additional information about the data were col-
lapsed together. ‘Defining and naming themes’ was
achieved by ongoing analysis. It was decided to use quotes
taken from the data as theme headings. The authors felt this
was an important aspect of giving people with intellectual
disabilities a greater presence in this article.
In addition to the six phases, the analysis for this study
also included an additional phase of ‘reflection’. After
conducting the interviews and before starting analysis, the
first author did not feel the study had yielded rich data to
contribute to the evidence base for mindfulness in intellec-
tual disabilities. This was due to assumptions of the first
author in relation to her position as the group facilitator and
interviewer for the study. On reflection, the first author
realised she was expecting to hear explanations of mind-
fulness she had used in the group when she interviewed the
participants. In contrast, the interviewees provided a variety
of accounts of mindfulness which made her doubt the
effectiveness of the group sessions. However, upon revis-
iting the interview transcripts, it became clear that perhaps
the findings produced a stronger case for the effectiveness
of mindfulness in intelle ctual disabilities, as the participants
had attached their own meaning to mindfulness which was
more relevant to their experiences.
ª 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 49–54
Mindfulness in intellectual disabilities 51
Following the analysis, five broad themes were identified
(see Fig. 1).
Focusing on one particular thing
The experience of participants fitted the theoretical aim of
mindfulness, of enabling people to pay attention in a
particular way. This helped participants to have control
over the focus of their attention:
Think about something else because I hear voices
Not think about things from past life
It also enabled one participant to change their mood
based on their orientation towards their experience:
Not worry about what’s around you at the moment
However, the focus of that attention was not always on
the present moment (as mindfulness is defined by e.g.
Kabat-Zinn 1994), but could be on other time or place:
Happy memories
Seeing the future clearly
Smell … think of what country it comes from
Improving skills
Participants recognised a range of skills that they attributed
to participating in mindfulness. Some of these were physical
skills, based on the exercises used. They were connoted in a
positive way by participants:
Makes arms strong
Practice breathing
Other skills were psychological. Participants were able to
use their own words to describe the skills they had learnt:
Learn more relaxation techniques
Close mind … close brain right down and switch off
Helping people
Interestingly, participants reported that their involvement
with mindfulness had enabled them to think about their
relationships with others and to take actions that were
caring towards others.
Brought candle … share with other service users
Want to relax to look after people
Come back … help at group don’t have to pay me
Caring for other people
Get rid of all nasty bad stuff you want to get rid of – staying calm and being happy
Participants attributed improvements in their mood and
reactions to the mindfulness exercises:
More relaxed at night
Improve my anger
If I get angry and agitated … know what to do before
out of control
Talk to people a little bit calmer instead of shouting at
them
Don’t get cross anymore
Help me release tension
Happy in a good mood
Makes you feel alright … feel good
Not very happy … squeeze panda
Bit too late to teach old dog new tricks
Learning mindfulness was effortful for participants. The
theme of ‘bit too late to teach old dog new tricks’
encapsulated all the difficulties encountered whilst using
mindfulness and the things the participants did not like
about it. Some participants doubted their own ability to
learn the techniques:
Figure 1 Five themes which emerged from data set.
ª 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 49–54
52 H. Yildiran and R. R. Holt
Something never done in past life before…bit hard to
do it
Hard to breathe from nose and mouth
Didn’t work for me…tensed in all my muscles
Others felt that there wasn’t a good match between their
personal attributes and mindfulness:
Exercises hurt knee
I find other ways of relaxing in my room listening to
music
I don’t like that kind of music [likes music with words]
Don’t have all the materials
Discussion
In this study, people with intellectual disabilities were able
to form an understanding of mindfulness. The themes that
emerged in the study can be divided into three broad
categories of intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of
mindfulness, and difficulties of learning and using mind-
fulness. Intrapersonal benefits were about reducing diffi-
culties and increasing positives (in relation to memories,
experiences and thoughts). This included the themes of
‘focusing on one particular thing’, ‘improving skills’, ‘get rid
of all nasty bad stuff you want to get rid of’. Interpersonal
benefits included the theme of ‘helping people’. The
interpersonal benefits may have been pronounced due to
the intervention being offered in a group setting.
Participants’ feedback on their experience of mindfulness
showed a similarity to descriptions of mindfulness in the
literature. This was evident in the themes which emerged in
the study, for example, ‘focusing on one particular thing’
which highlighted the importance of focusing one’s atten-
tion. However, the focus was not always ‘the moment’, but
for some participants was on another time or place. Despite
this, participants showed benefits that are similar to those
associated with being mindful in the moment, such as stress
reduction and reduced emotional reactivity (Davis & Hayes
2011). It is of note that participants were able to benefit from
the techniques even whilst having a different internal
experience to ‘classic’ mindfulness.
When considering adaptations of mindfulness for
people with intellectual disabilities, it may be beneficial
for more sessions to be offered, or for different or
additional explanations and/or techniques to be intro-
duced. It would be interesting to see whether this led to
greater benefits.
There were also some themes which were more loosely
related to mindfulness. Some of the participants under-
standing of mindfulness appeared to be in relation to the
relaxation effects it induces (e.g. ‘Learn more relaxation
techniques’, ‘Want to relax to look after people’, ‘More
relaxed at night’).
The literature appears to convey a mixed relationship
between mindfulness and relaxation. Although the relaxing
effect of meditation practices has been documented (Wal-
lace et al. 1984), it is not regarded as the primary purpose of
mindfulness meditation (Shapiro 1982) but rather a second-
ary gain. Jain et al. (2007) compared mindfulness meditation
with relaxation training in relation to their effects on
distress, positive states of mind, rumination and distraction.
They found that both interventions produced similar stress
reduction compared to no treatment control; however,
mindfulness produced an additional benefit in reducing
ruminative thoughts.
People with intellectual disabilities may find it easier to
reportrelaxingeffectsofmeditationastheymayfinditeasierto
identify these from the feedback of their body’s response to it
andmayfindtheabstractnatureofreportingonthoughtsmore
difficult. This difference may be one produced by language
and communication difficulties. It may also have been due to
participants’ relative level of exposure to the two interven-
tions,mindfulnessbeinganewskill theyhadnothadprevious
experience of, whereas all of the participants had experience
of relaxation techniques prior to attending the group.
It surprised the authors that one of the themes ‘helping
people’ described participants becoming more caring
towards others. It has been claimed that mindfulness skills
enhance the capacity for caring relationships with others
(Siegel 2007), which was the experie nce of participants in this
study. This is one of the mechanisms that may enable
mindfulness to increase the skills of staff who support people
with intellectual disabilities. Research has shown that mind-
fulness training enables primary care physicians to be more
empathic and caring of their patients (Krasner et al. 2009).
Perhaps it should have been no surprise that it also happens
for people other than care staff who learn mindfulness.
Some of the difficulties in engaging in mindfulness
described by the theme ‘bit too late to teach old dog new
tricks’ are related to learning. Participants in the study all had
intellectual disabilities and are in a culture where theywould
bemore often described as having ‘learning disabilities’. This
may increase the likelihood of individuals feeling daunted
and lacking confidence about learning new techniques.
Limitations of study
One of the limitations of the study is in relation to the first
author having a dual role as relaxation and mindfulness
group facilitator and interviewer. The dual role of facilitator
and interviewer was used as it was felt that familiarity will
help participants orient themselves to the study. However,
it could have affected the responses of the participants,
biasing them towards the positive (social desirability effect).
An additional limitation was in relation to nature of the
group sessions which combinedmindfulness with relaxation
techniques. This may have contributed to the participants’
ª 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 49–54
Mindfulness in intellectual disabilities 53
reports of the relaxation effects mindfulness induced for
them. The authors decided to offer mindfulness, a relatively
new skill with a familiar intervention of relaxation to encour-
age attendance in the group. It would be interesting to repeat
this study for a mindfulness group without relaxation.
Although staff participated in the sessions along with
service users, they were not interviewed as part of this study.
It would be valuable to analyse their experiences, both in
terms of the effect of mindfulness on their own practice, and
any impact they perceived on the service users.
Implications for practice
The themes identified in the study highlighted that people
with intellectual disabilities can develop an understanding
of mindfulness and identify positive impacts this can have
on their lives. The effectiveness of mindfulness has been
well documented in the literature, and it is encouraging that
people with intellectual disabilities within an inpatient
setting can also benefit from this. There may be a need for
further adaptations to mindfulness to suit the communica-
tion needs of people with intellectual disabilities, for
example, offering more sessions, more visual prompts,
and using objects of reference.
Acknowledgements
Grateful thanks is given to Kathie Parkinson (Chartered
Clinical Psychologist); Rebecca Davenport (Trainee Clinical
Psychologist) and Jesvir Dhillon (Assistant Psychologist) for
supporting in the setting up and facilitating of the group.
References
Barker E.S. & Edwards R. (2012) How many qualitative interviews
is enough? NCRM, Available at: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/
2273/ (last accessed on 25 October 2013).
Biegel G.M. (2009) Mindfulness-based stress reduction for the
treatment of adolescent psychiatric outpatients: a randomized
clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol, 77: 855–66.
Bishop S.R., Lau M., Shapiro S., Carlson L., Anderson N.D. et al.
(2004) Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clin
Psychol Sci Pract, 11: 230–41.
Braun V. & Clarke V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology.
Qual Res Psychol, 3: 77–101.
Braun V. & Clarke V. (2013) Methods: teaching thematic analysis.
Psychologist, BPS, 26: 120–3.
Brown F.J. & Hooper S. (2009) Acceptance and commitment therapy
(ACT) with a learning disabled young person experiencing
anxious and obsessive thoughts. J Intellect Disabil, 13/3: 195–201.
Burke C.A. (2010) Mindfulness-Based approaches with children and
adolescents: a preliminary review of current research in an
emergent field. J Child Fam Stud, 19: 133–44.
Care Quality Commission (2011) Review of compliance:
Winterbourne View.
Davis D.M. & Hayes J.A. (2011) What are the benefits of
mindfulness? A practice review of psychotherapy-related
research. Psychotherapy, 48: 198–208.
Felder J.N., Dimidjian S. & Segal Z. (2012) Collaboration in
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. J Clin Psychol, 68: 179–86.
Hofmann S.G., Sawyer A.T., Witt A.A. & Oh D. (2010) The effect of
mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: a meta-
analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol, 78: 169–83.
Jain S., Shapiro S.L., Swanick S., Roesch S.C., Mills P.J. et al. (2007) A
randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation versus
relaxation training: effects on distress, positive states of mind,
rumination and distraction. Ann Behav Med, 33: 11–21.
Kabat-Zinn J. (1994) Wherever you go, there you are: mindfulness
meditation in everyday life. New York, Hyperion.
Kabat-Zinn J. (2012) Mindfulness for beginners: reclaiming the present
moment and your life. Louiseville, KY, Sounds True Inc.
Krasner M.S., Epstein R.M., Beckman H., Suchman A.L., Chapman
B. et al. (2009) Association of an educational program in mindful
communication with burnout, empathy, and attitudes among
primary care physicians. JAMA, 302: 1284–93.
NICE (2009) Borderline personality disorder (BPD) (CG78).
Noone S.J. & Hastings R.P. (2010) Using acceptance and
mindfulness – based workshops with support staff caring
for adults with Intellectual disabilities. Mindfulness, 1/2: 67–73.
Paterson B., Leadbetter D., Wilkinson D. & Bowie V. (2011) How
corrupted cultures lead to abuse of restraint interventions. Learn
Disabil Pract, 14: 24–8.
Robertson B. (2011) The adaptation and application of mindfulness –
based psychotherapeutic practices for individualswith Intellectual
disabilities. Adv Ment Health Intellect Disabil, 5/5: 46–52.
Shapiro D.H. (1982) Overview: clinical and physiological
comparisons of meditation with other self-control strategies. Am J
Psychiatry, 139: 267–74.
Siegal Z.V., Williams J.M. & Teasdale J.D. (2002)Mindfulness-based
cognitive therapy for depression. NewYork, NY, The Guildford Press.
Siegel D.J. (2007) The mindful brain: reflection and attunement in the
cultivation of well-being. New York, WW Norton.
Singh N.N., Wahler R.G., Adkins A.D. & Myers R.E. (2003) Soles of
the feet: a mindfulness-based self control intervention for
aggression by an individual with mild mental retardation and
mental illness. Res Dev Disabil, 24/3: 158–69.
Singh N.N., Lancioni G.E., Winton A.S., Adkins A.D., Singh J. et al.
(2007) Mindfulness training assists individuals with moderate
mental retardation to maintain their community placement.
Behav Modif, 31: 800–14.
Singh N.N., Lancioni G.E., Winton A.S., Singh A.N., Adkins
A.D. et al. (2008) Clinical and benefit-cost outcomes of teaching a
mindfulness – based procedure to adult offenders with
Intellectual disabilities. Behav Modif, 32/5: 622–37.
Singh N.N., Lancioni G.E., Winton A.S., Singh A.N., Adkins
A.D. et al. (2009) Mindful staff can reduce the use of physical
restraints when providing care to individuals with Intellectual
disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil, 22/2: 194–202.
Wallace R.K., Benson H. & Wilson A.F. (1984) A wakeful
hypometabolic physiologic state. In: Shapiro D.H. Jr, Walsh
R.N., editors. Meditation: classic and contemporary perspectives.
New York, Aldine: 417–31.
ª 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 49–54
54 H. Yildiran and R. R. Holt
Copyright of British Journal of Learning Disabilities is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.