How effective is Social Constructivism for framing the study of political questions?

(c) consistently referenced NB: marks will be deducted if the essays are not properly referenced.

Referencing can either be Harvard (Martin 2015) or Chicago style – but be consistent (do not mix and match these two styles of referencing).

Reading list;

Almond, G. (1996) ‘Political Science: the history of the discipline’ in R. E. Goodin and H. D. Klingemann (eds.) A New Handbook of Political Science Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Arato, A. and Geibhardt, E. (eds.) (1978) The Essential Frankfurt School Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

Barrett, M. (1991) The Politics of Truth: from Marx to Foucault. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Barth, L. (1998) ‘Michel Foucault’ in R. Stones (ed.) Key Sociological Thinkers Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave

Baylis, J. and Smith, S. (2006) The Globalisation of World Politics: an introduction to international relations. Third Edition. Oxford: OUP. Chapter 11

Beardsworth, R. (2005) ‘The Future of Critical Philosophy and World Politics’, Millenium, 34 (1).

Benton,T. and Craib, I. (2001) Philosophy of Social Science: the philosophical foundations of social thought. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Bevir, M. and Rhodes R. A. W. (2002) ‘Interpretive Theory’ in D. Marsh and G. Stoker (eds.) Theory and Methods in Political Science Houndsmill, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Second Edition

Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R.A.W. (2003) Interpreting British Governance. London Routledge.

Blumenfeld, W. J. and Breen, M.S. (2005) Butler Matters: Judith Butler’s impact on feminist and queer studies. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Bottomore, T. (1984) The Frankfurt School. Chichester: Horwood.

Boyne, R. (1990) Foucault and Derrida: the other side of reason. London: Unwin and Hyman.

Bryson, V. (2003) Feminist Political Theory. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan.

Burns, T. (2000) ‘What is Politics? Robinson Crusoe, Deep Ecology and Immanuel Kant’ in Politics 20 (2): 93-98.

Butler, J. (1993) Bodies That Matter: on the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York: Routledge.

Carmines, E. G. and Huckfeldt, R. (1996) ‘Political Behaviour: an overview’ in R. E. Goodin and H. D. Klingemann (eds.) A New Handbook of Political Science Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chapter 1 of Savigny, H and Marsden, L. (2011) Doing Political Science and International Relations Palgrave Macmillan

Code, L. (1988) ‘Experience, Knowledge and Responsibility’ in M. Griffiths, and M. Whitford (eds.) Feminist Perspectives in Philosophy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Crick, B. (2000) In Defence of Politics. London: Continuum. Chapter 1

Crick, B. (1954) ‘The Science of Politics in the United States’ in The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 20(3): 308-320.

Crick, B. (1982) The American Science of Politics: its origins and conditions Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press.

Danaher, G. et al. (2000) Understanding Foucault. London: Sage.

De. Jouvenel, B. (1961) ‘On the Nature of Political Science’ in The American Political Science Review 55 (4): 773-779.

Delanty, G. (1997) Social Science: beyond constructivism and realism. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Delanty, G. and Strydom, P. (eds.) (2003) Philosophies of Social Science: the classic and contemporary readings. Maidenhead: Open University.

Dews, P. (1987) ‘Michel Foucault: Power and Knowledge’ in P. Dews Logics of Disintegration: post-structuralist thought and the claims of critical theory. London: Verso. **

Dreyfus, H. L. and Rabinow, P. (1982) Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Brighton: Harvester Press.

Easton, D. (1969) ‘The New Revolution in Political Science’ in The American Political Science Review 63 (4): 1051-1061.

Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. (2001) ‘Taking Stock: the constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics’ in Annual Review of Political Science (4): 391–416.

Foucault, M. (1981) Power/Knowledge. New York: Pantheon. Foucault, M. (1984) ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’ in P.

Rabinow (ed.) The Foucault Reader. London: Penguin. Foucault, M. (1984) ‘Truth and Power’ in P. Rabinow (ed.)

The Foucault Reader. London: Penguin.

Foucault, M. (1994) ‘Questions of Method’ in J. F. Faubion (ed.) The Essential Works of Foucault. Volume Three: Power. Penguin Books. **

Frickner, M. (2000) ‘Feminism in Epistemology: pluralism without postmodernism’ in M. Fricker, and J. Hornsby (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Furlong, P. and Marsh, D. (2010) ‘A Skin not a Sweater: ontology and epistemology in political science’ in D. Marsh and G. Stoker (eds.) Theory and Methods in Political Science Houndsmill, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. TGamble, A. and Marsh, D. et al. (eds.) (1999) Marxism and

Social Science. Houndsmill, Basingstoke: MacMillan. Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures: selected

essays. New York: Basis Books. Gemes, K. (1992) ‘Nietzsche’s Critique of Truth’ in

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 52 (1): 47-65. Gorton, W. A. (2006) Karl Popper and the Social Sciences.

Albany: State University of New York Press.

Grofman, J.G. ‘Seven Durable Axes of Cleavage in Political Science’ in K.R. Monroe (ed.) Contemporary Empirical Political Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Gutting, G. (2005) Foucault: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gutting, G. (ed.) (2005) The Cambridge Companion to Foucault. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Haber, H. F. (1994) Beyond Postmodern Politics: Lyotard, Rorty, Foucault. New York: Routledge.

Hammersley, M. (2000) Taking Sides In Social Research: essays on partisanship and bias. London: Routledge.

Harding, S. (1986) The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Harding, S. (1992) ‘After the Neutrality Ideal: science, politics and ‘strong objectivity’’ in Social Research 59 (3): 568-87. **

Harding, S. (2004) ‘Introduction: standpoint theory as a site of political, philosophical, and scientific debate’ in S. Harding (ed.) The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader. New York/ London: Routledge.

Harding, S. (ed.) (1987) Feminism And Methodology. Bloomington: Indianna University Press.

Harding, S. (ed.) (2004) The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader. New York/London: Routledge.

hird Edition: pp 184-211 **Marsh, D. and Stoker, G. (2010)

Sylvester, C. (2002) Feminist International Relations: an unfinished journey. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.

Tallack, D. (ed) (1995) Critical Theory: a reader. New York/London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Tickner, A. J. (1992) Gender in International Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.

Trigg, R. (1985) Understanding Social Science: a philosophical introduction to the social sciences. Oxford: Blackwell.

Turner, B. S. (ed.) (1990) Theories of Modernity and Postmodernity. London: Sage Publications.

Warren, M. E. (1999) ‘What is political?’ in Journal of Theoretical Politics 11(2): 207-231.

Wendt, A. (1992) ‘Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics’ in International Organisation 46 (2): 391-425

Wendt, A. (1992) Social Theory of International Politics. New York: CUP.

Wenman, M.A. (2003) ‘What is Politics? The Approach of Radical Pluralism’ in Politics 23 (1): 57-65.

Wilcox, L. (2014) ‘Making Bodies Matter in IR’ Millennium – Journal of International Studies September 2014 vol. 43 no. 1 359-364

Williams, M. and May, T. (1996) Introduction to the Philosophy of Social Research. London: UCL Press.

Wylie, A. ‘Feminism in Philosophy of Science: making sense of contingency and constraint’ in M. Fricker, and J. Hornsby (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rorty, R. (1992) ‘The contingency of Language’ in Contingency, Irony and Solidarity Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 3-23

Rosenau, P. M. (1992) Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences: insights, inroads, and intrusions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Salih, S. (ed.) (2003) The Judith Butler Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sanders, D. (2010) ‘Behavioural Analysis’ in D. Marsh and G. Stoker (eds.) Theory and Methods in Political Science Houndsmill, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Third Edition: pp 23-41 **

Sayer, A. (1994) Method in Social Science: a realist approach. London: Routledge.

Seller, A. (1988) ‘Realism vs. Relativism: towards a politically adequate epistemology’ in M. Griffiths, and M. Whitford (eds.) Feminist Perspectives in Philosophy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Shepsle, K. A. and Bonchek, M. S. (1997) Analyzing Politics: rationality, behaviour, and institutions. New York and London: W.W. Norton.

Simons, J. (1995) Foucault and the Political. London: Routledge.

Slater, P. (1977) Origin and Significance of the Frankfurt School: a Marxist perspective. London: Routledge.

Smart, B. (1983) Foucault, Marxism and Critique. London: Routledge.

Smith, S. (2007) ‘Introduction’ in Dunne, T., Kuki, M. and Smith, S (eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity Oxford: OUP. **

Steinmetz, G. (ed.) (2005) The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: positivism and its epistemological others. London: Duke University Press.

Susser, B. (1974) ‘The Behavioural Ideology: A Review and Retrospect’ in Political Studies 22 (3): 271-288

Kellner, D. (1991) ‘Introduction to the Second Edition’ in H. Marcuse One-dimensional Man: studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. London: Routledge. **

Kim, K.W. (1965) ‘Limits of Behavioural Explanation in Politics’ in The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 31(3): 315-327.

Lloyd, M. (2007) Judith Butler: from norms to politics. Cambridge: Polity.

Lukes, S. (1974) Power: a radical view. London: Macmillan. Lyotard, J. F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A report on

knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Magee, B. (1985) Popper. London: Fontana.

Marcuse H. (1991) One-dimensional Man: studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. London: Routledge.

Marcuse, H. (1991) ‘Introduction to the First Edition’ in H. Marcuse One-dimensional Man: studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. London: Routledge. **

Marsh, D. (2002). ‘Marxism’ in D. Marsh and G. Stoker (eds.) Theory and Methods in Political Science Houndsmill, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Second Edition

Merquior, J. G. (1991) Foucault. London: Fontana. Miller, D. (ed.) (1985) Popper Selections. Princeton,

N.J: Princeton University Press.

Miller, W. (1996) ‘Political Behaviour, Old and New’ in R. E. Goodin and H. D. Klingemann (eds.) A New Handbook of Political Science Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Parsons, C. (2010) ‘Constructivism and Interpretivist Theory’ in D. Marsh and G. Stoker (eds.) Theory and Methods in Political Science Houndsmill, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Third Edition: pp 80-98.

Popper, K. (1972) Conjectures and Refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge.